Jitsi Meet vs Neko: which one to choose in 2026?
Both are open source alternatives to Zoom. We compare license, tech stack and features to help you decide which fits your team best.
| Jitsi Meet | Neko | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | 24k | 9k |
| Tech stack | React, WebRTC, XMPP | Go, WebRTC, GStreamer |
| Replaces | Zoom, Google Meet | Zoom |
Jitsi Meet has more GitHub stars, which usually indicates a larger community (not necessarily that it's the best option for your use case).
Jitsi Meet
Video calls with no limits or account, a direct alternative to Zoom.
Pros
- Free, with none of the SaaS version's artificial limits
Things to consider
- The full stack has 4 services to coordinate
Neko
Shared streaming virtual browser, for watch parties and collaboration.
Pros
- A unique use case Zoom doesn't cover well (a real shared browser)
Things to consider
- Not a general substitute for work video calls
Key features
Jitsi Meet
- No time or participant limit
- No account needed to join
- Recording and YouTube streaming
Neko
- Real-time shared browser
- Built-in voice and text chat
- Ideal for watch parties or remote tech support