Appwrite vs Hasura: which one to choose in 2026?
Both are open source alternatives to Firebase. We compare license, tech stack and features to help you decide which fits your team best.
| Appwrite | Hasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dev Tools | Dev Tools |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | 47k | 31k |
| Tech stack | PHP, MariaDB, Redis | Haskell, PostgreSQL |
| Replaces | Firebase | Firebase, AWS AppSync |
Appwrite has more GitHub stars, which usually indicates a larger community (not necessarily that it's the best option for your use case).
Appwrite
Multi-language backend-as-a-service, an alternative to Firebase.
Pros
- Carefully crafted cross-platform developer experience
Things to consider
- Stack with several internal containers, heavier to audit
Hasura
Instant GraphQL API over PostgreSQL, an alternative to Firebase/AppSync.
Pros
- No need to write resolvers by hand
Things to consider
- Mainly built for PostgreSQL/a few other databases, not NoSQL
Key features
Appwrite
- SDKs for Flutter, Swift, Android, Web and more
- Serverless functions in multiple runtimes
- Very complete control panel
Hasura
- Instant GraphQL and REST over PostgreSQL
- Realtime subscriptions
- Row-level permissions